Denne indvandring skal stadig foregå fra Nordafrikanske lande.
De Mellemøstlige lande har stadig fået stillet i udsigt, at opnå adgang til EUs fire fundamentale friheder, her i blandt fri bevægelse af personer og arbejdskraft.
Da jeg først hørte om Eurabia, var jeg tilbøjelig til at afvise det som en konspirationsteori. Så dumme og dybt debile/Inhabile kan vores politikere da ikke være?
Jo, det kan de faktisk. Hør denne beretning fra bloggen GalliaWatch, som har oversat forfatteren Malik Sorel.
"To them we no longer exist": fra et ministerseminar om immigration, EU og middelhav:
"The migrations in the lands of the Mediterranean: constructing a space of shared prosperity". Insofar as many journalists covered the seminar, I feel safe in sharing with you a few high points.
The ministers of Cyprus, Greece, Spain, Croatia, Malta, Montenegro, Morocco, and Egypt were among the guests.
One expert set the tone right away by declaring that since the European population was aging, three possibilities ensued. I quote them:
1. We delay the age of retirement. Not a very popular measure.
2. We put more women in the workplace. That would have a negative effect on the birth rate.
3. We organize international migrations.
And with these words, obviously intended to allow the ministers to begin their well-prepared speeches, the main theme of the morning was set: since the North was not producing children, and the South producing many (they actually said it), it was necessary to agree to organize migratory waves from the South to the North. Several ministers even declared that since immigration, in any case, was occurring illegally when it was not authorized, it would be preferable to legalize and organize it. They also said that 75% of the youth of Tunisia were considering leaving their country...
Og så disse citater fra mødet!:
"Immigration increases the competitiveness of the countries of the North."
- "Immigration benefits the countries of the South as well as those of the North."
- "Since labor from the South is unskilled and since the North will need more and more a supply of skilled labor, the Northern countries must help train the labor from the South so that it can fulfill the requirements."
Vi skal også til at bruge penge og ressourcer på skabe bedre uddannelsessystemer i disse lande. Vi har ikke engang råd til at skabe ordentlige forhold i vores eget land og vi får i mindre grad råd senere hen.
- "We must facilitate the ability of the immigrants to remain in contact with their homelands and to transfer a part of their earnings."Tanken er angiveligt, at det skaber stabilitet. Jeg vil mene, at vi vil miste så mange penge ved det, at en allerede dårlig forretning bliver dårligere og pengene var bedre investeret i militæret og nogle høje hegn, da konflikten nok skal komme dernede uanset hvad.
- "We must organize welcoming committees in such a way that they recognize their diversity. At any rate, it's the example that will be used everywhere. Priority must be given to the fight against discrimination."Det er ikke Islam som er fjenden, det er ledere som disse her. En mere uduelig, marxistisk hjerneparalyseret menighed, skal man lede længe efter.
- "Poverty and the lack of development were caused by colonization."
"Immigration is perhaps the solution to the crisis," a Swedish minister said solemnly.
Islam kunne nøjes med at skabe problemer for sig selv, islam har aldrig behøvet at være en trussel mod os.
Hvis disse menneskers idéer bliver virkelighed, er Europa muslimsk på lyntid. Hvad det vil medføre? Det vil medføre elendighed i ufatteligt omfang, blod i lange strømme og kriminalitetsforøgelser sat på samlebånd. Det vil betyde tabet af friheden. Vi forstår slet ikke, hvad vi mister der, borgerne i det tidligere DDR vidste, hvad vi havde, når de byggede luftballoner for at flygte - vi ved det åbenbart ikke selv.
Konklusionen på ministerseminaret?:
Eric Besson concluded the meeting thus: "We must accelerate and increase the mass movements."
All the ministers signed the "Paris recommendation on the promotion of the mobility of young persons in the Mediterranean space," of which this is an excerpt: "Reaffirming their determination to build a common Mediterranean future, they agree on the necessity to give priority to youth in the construction of a Mediterranean space for the movement of persons, of knowledge and of skills."
A Mediterranean office of youth will be created by January 1, 2011. Its goal will be to facilitate the free movement of students of certain universities, and to provide them with grants. (...)
During this entire morning it was patently clear that European peoples were of no interest to the European ministers. It was as if Europe was an uninhabited land, or soon to become one, and there was a need to people it. The only moment when you felt that Europeans still existed in the minds of these ministers was when mention was made of the need to fight against the discrimination that these migrants would be victims of...
This morning showed me, as if it was still necessary to do so, the extent to which this European "elite" was sometimes more concerned about the interests of foreign populations that about those of their own people. It is indeed this elite that is responsible for the current situation, and not the immigrants. Henceforth, only the European populations themselves will be able to spare their countries chaos, and at the same time save their lives and those of their descendants, for it is clear that what is being planned for us by leaders who don't even realize it, is a proliferation of Balkan States throughout the European Union. We are indeed far away from the dreams of the founding fathers!
2 kommentarer:
Men eliten er jo blot enten dem vi stemmer på, eller det bureaukratur, vi stemmer "ja" til. Så VI er problemet, hverken politikere (ingen er jo forpligtet udover deres evner) eller indvandrere.
Ja, du har skam ret i, at det bliver spændende, om de unge mennesker fra de muslimske lande, af ren og skær tåreblændet taknemlighed, vil betale for vores alderdom. De har jo ikke selv nogle familiemedlemmer i pensionsalderen til den tid, så det er blot os, fra en gammel kultur-kristen befolkning, de skal understøtte.
Forhåbentlig er de så generøse og altruistiske, at de vil det, og ikke i stedet begynde at gennemføre deres egne dagsordener.
Men det må et flertal af os jo være nået frem til, at det vil de med stor sikkerhed.
- - -
Jeg er for så vidt enig, men hvor mange folk ved det her? Man kan ikke stille den europæiske befolkning til regnskab for noget den ikke ved. Nemlig at indvandringen er ikke noget man planerer at mindske, men at forøge.
Men hvad mennesker stemmer på, er hvad de får og sådan skal det være i mine øjne. Når folket vil bevare efterlønsordningen, skal de have lov, for demokrati er ansvar for fremtiden.
Og vi lærer oftest bedst og grundigst ved at tage fejl.
Men i det her spørgsmål tror jeg ikke befolkningen ønsker en stor indvandring fra Mellemøsten.
Derfor foregår det hele meget tys tys i magtens korridorer uden den store debat og det bliver aldrig ok.
Jeg tror godt man kan satse på at halvdelen af muslimerne vil indgå fint i vores samfund på sigt.
Men jeg er også sikker på at en stor gruppe vil være noget nølende og knap så solidariske, for at slet ikke tale om at en gruppe radikale muslimer 5-20 procent har en helt anden dagsorden, nemlig islamisering af Europa. En dagsorden en del af dem vil være villige til at bruge alle midler for at opnå.
At vores politikere ikke kan indse, at hvad der er et problem selv i de muslimske hjemlande, også bliver et problem her. Det taler næppe til deres fordel. Der findes ellers rigelige tegn på den endnu spæde begyndelse af allehånde problemer.
Fra parallelsamfund, til kriminalitet, til direkte bevæbnet modstand mod indblanding i forhold som gælder de områder som muslimerne bebor og betragter som "deres".
Send en kommentar